Mao Takada vs Hanival Kahsay Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Takada vs Kahsay analysis and find out who is favored!
Mao Takada vs Hanival Kahsay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Takada 2 - 0 Kahsay
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Takada has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kahsay has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Takada, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kahsay has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Takada has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kahsay has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Takada has won 8.33% of matches played (W/L 1/ 11), with Kahsay winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Takada has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 8/ 24). Kahsay has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Takada has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 8.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 11), where as Kahsay has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 6/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Takada winning 2 times and Kahsay being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Takada winning 4 and Kahsay winning 1. The last match between Takada and Kahsay was at the M25 Harmon, 07-06-2022, First, Hard with Mao Takada getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Takada and Kahsay have played a deciding set 1 times, with Takada winning 1 times and Kahsay 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Takada winning 0, and Kahsay 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Takada has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Kahsay has played against players with an average rank of 27.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Takada has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kahsay has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Takada has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kahsay has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mao Takada
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Hanival Kahsay
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
24% (11-34)
Career Total W/L
39% (12-19)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mao Takada | Hanival Kahsay |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 25 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 12 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (74/133) | 54% (73/135) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (48/74) | 53% (39/73) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (28/59) | 39% (24/62) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (11/21) | 64% (7/11) |
Return Points W% | 53% (72/135) | 43% (57/133) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Mao Takada
Player
Hanival Kahsay
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
6-2 1-6 6-2 |
Mao Takada
Player
Hanival Kahsay
45%
(
34 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mao Takada | Hanival Kahsay |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (20/28) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mao Takada Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Cooper Wilkinson
Player
Mao Takada
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patorn Hanchaikul
Player
Mao Takada
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chase Ferguson
Player
Mao Takada
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Justin Kuo
Player
Mao Takada
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Anthony Susanto
Player
Mao Takada
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Hanival Kahsay Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-3 13-11 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Hanival Kahsay
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
38%
(
20 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Xing Dao Chen
Player
Hanival Kahsay
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Changli Zhang
Player
Hanival Kahsay
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Jiayang Dong
Player
Hanival Kahsay
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-1 9-4 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-7(2) 10-6 | H2H |
view more